🔗 Share this article

The Australian bold move to prohibit social media access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, campaigners, and parents are watching intently to see if this strategy will inspire imitation for countries abroad.

The European Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of states are exploring comparable measures.

• The Danish government has stated a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the leader declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our children's childhood". Legislation is expected to be passed in the coming year.
• Norway is planning to implement a age restriction of 15, pointing to the need to protect children from the "manipulative force of the algorithms".
• Ireland is working on a digital ID system to confirm the identity and age of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an Australia-style ban remains "a potential measures on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the prime minister has asked lawmakers to enact a bill increasing the minimum age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has floated the idea of a ban for children below 15, and a government panel has recommended a comparable move, potentially involving an overnight "internet blackout" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their kids from social media until 15.

At the EU level, the bloc's legislature has passed a advisory motion supporting a ban for under-16s except if a parent decides otherwise is granted. Although it warns of the "compulsive" design of these services, the move does not create enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a good foundation," stated the European lawmaker behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Watchful Stance

In the UK, the leadership has kept open a potential ban, arguing that "no measure is off the table" but maintaining any action must be "supported by strong research".

Earlier, interest grew behind a legislative effort to impose limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was eventually watered down. Instead, the government committed to conduct more studies the topic.

Charities have raised apprehensions. One foundation set up by the loved ones of a teenager who died after being exposed to harmful social media material argues that a simple age ban may not protect children and could lead to a "dangerous transition" of risk when users turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a response to the failure of the tech sector to build tools that are safe and fit for minors," commented a influential child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, action is mostly occurring at the regional government level amid country-wide gridlock.

• Utah mandates parental consent for minors to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has enacted a law banning those below 14 from accessing social media, though it faces constitutional disputes.
• The state of Virginia has passed a regulation restricting minors to a single hour of social media time per day, with extra time dependent on adult consent.
• Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise enacted bills requiring parental consent for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Even with widespread concern and calls from some politicians to mimic Australia's path, a nationwide ban is right now seen as improbable.

Worldwide Views

Outside of Europe and the US, other states are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to prohibit social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has raised the access age for one major platform to 16.

Yet, international bodies adopt a more cautious stance. The UN children's agency has cautioned that blanket prohibitions carry risks and "could backfire". The agency highlights that social networks can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable young people and that government action should not be a "substitute" for tech companies to prioritize safety.

While this worldwide debate unfolds, the policies of Australia and several other countries demonstrate that governments globally are less and less content to wait for tech companies to act voluntarily.